AI × Law

Generative AI legal platform Harvey is reportedly in discussions to raise at least $500 million in new funding. The proposed round would elevate the startup's valuation to $15.5 billion, signaling continued massive investor demand for legal AI tools.

In a landmark 135-page judgment, the Delhi High Court denied ANI Media's application for an interim injunction against OpenAI, ruling that storing news articles to train ChatGPT falls within India's 'private or personal use, including research' fair dealing exception. The court also affirmed jurisdiction over foreign AI developers serving Indian users, establishing that temporary foreign data storage forms part of a continuous chain of domestic acts.

The non-profit Free Law Project has published its comprehensive AI policies, guiding the use of third-party AI tools, the development of their own AI systems, and volunteer contributions. The policies emphasize human oversight, accuracy, data protection, and transparency, aiming to set a standard for other organizations.

Legal AI startup GC AI acquired backend software firm Jetify to strengthen the infrastructure behind its new Contract Intelligence solution and future AI tools for in-house legal teams. This move aims to enhance GC AI's competitiveness against larger tech platforms offering AI for in-house counsel, such as Microsoft Copilot.

Nextiva has introduced an AI-powered communication solution, XBert AI, designed specifically for law firms. The tool aims to automate client intake, qualify leads, book consultations, and manage communication, freeing up legal professionals for billable work.

Pillsbury has hired Oz Benamram, a veteran legal innovation strategist, as its Chief AI Officer. This move positions Pillsbury among the first major law firms to establish a dedicated C-suite role for AI, signaling a shift in BigLaw's approach to integrating artificial intelligence beyond mere tool adoption into core management infrastructure.

Legal tech company Litify introduced LitifyAI Instant Demands, an AI feature within its case management platform for personal injury firms. Developed in partnership with Supio, the tool automates the creation of demand letters and exhibit packets, aiming to save over 40 hours of manual pre-litigation work per case.

The LegalTech Fund is a venture capital firm investing in companies that develop technology to transform the legal industry. It supports businesses aiming to modernize how law is practiced and accessed.

Internal documents show AI giant Anthropic launched 'Project Panama' to destructively scan all books in the world for AI training, prioritizing speed and cost over preservation, despite legal challenges and a $1.5 billion settlement for using pirated books. This highlights ongoing copyright and ethical concerns in AI data acquisition.

A U.S. District Court in New York ruled that a defendant's communications with the generative AI platform Claude were not protected by attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. The court found Claude was not an attorney, its user agreement negated confidentiality, and the client did not use it to obtain legal advice from the AI itself. This decision provides critical guidance for attorneys and clients on protecting confidentiality when integrating AI into legal work.

The New York City Bar Association's "Presidential Task Force Report on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies" analyzes the impact of LLMs and their privacy policies on confidential information and privilege. It provides practical guidance for lawyers on protecting attorney-client privilege and work product when using generative AI, including client counseling strategies and frameworks for addressing privilege disputes.

TrueScreen has released a dedicated 'Forensic Browser' application designed for legal professionals to capture and certify web content as court-admissible evidence. The tool features geo-routed acquisition, tamper-evident chains, and AI detection for deepfakes and generative AI content, aiming to simplify the process of gathering digital evidence.

xAI has filed a lawsuit seeking to block Minnesota's new law prohibiting AI nudification technology, arguing it's an overbroad, content-based restriction on free speech. This legal challenge tests the limits of state regulation on AI tools and the scope of First Amendment protections for AI-generated content.

Midpage has introduced an AI-powered legal research tool specifically designed for securities litigators. The platform helps users research complex claims like 10b-5 fraud, PSLRA pleading, and loss-causation theories by collecting relevant statutes, regulations, and case law.

A new derivative lawsuit targets Nvidia's directors, alleging they knowingly permitted AI models to infringe copyrights and violate BIPA through data training. This action, following similar suits against Microsoft and Adobe, highlights an emerging 'silent AI' trend where non-covered AI liabilities are converted into D&O claims through breach of fiduciary duty allegations.

HR software giant Rippling has filed a patent infringement lawsuit against AI startup Runlayer, alleging that Runlayer's platform infringes its patents and steals intellectual property. This comes as a counter to Runlayer's earlier trade secret lawsuit against Rippling, which accused Rippling of building a clone of its AI product.

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Datavault AI Inc. (NASDAQ: DVLT) on behalf of investors, alleging that the company made materially false or misleading statements regarding its business prospects, partnerships, and platform activity. The complaint also claims undisclosed connections with a convicted felon, which allegedly caused reputational harm. Investors have until October 5, 2026, to seek lead plaintiff status.

CopySight AI, a platform that scans AI-generated content for copyright risks, secured $3 million in seed funding. The company aims to provide tools for studios and creators to ensure their AI-generated media is free from infringement, a growing concern in the entertainment industry.

Lawsuits against AI companies jumped from 3 in 2020 to 200 by July 2023, with OpenAI facing the most cases. Experts anticipate a further surge in litigation as autonomous AI agents become more prevalent, raising new legal risks related to fraud, privacy, discrimination, and accountability. Copyright disputes currently account for 65.5% of these cases.

New SRA guidance from June 2026 and two 2025 High Court judgments clarify that UK law firms must ensure human review, professional judgment, and verification for AI-assisted work. Firms are liable for AI output, cannot upload confidential client data to open-source tools, and need to adapt supervision, training, and pricing models for AI integration.