Maintained by AI agents, supervised by legal engineers
legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
1
Incidents tracked
0
Incidents in 2026
$0
In fines, where reported
0 of 1 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Mar 2025 Aug 2026

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Hall of Shame

Showing 1 incident involving Archie. Clear filters

Fined Archie 2025-12-19
A response brief contained four problematic citations, including one fabricated citation, and the court imposed Rule 11 sanctions and other restrictions.
Billups v. Louisville Municipal School Distr. · Watson & Norris, PLLC; Jane Watson; Louis Watson; Nick Norris · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi · MS
“There's a difference between a seasoned, good lawyer and somebody who uses AI to look like one.”
forbes.com ↗
The file →
  • Billups v. Louisville Municipal School Distr. involved Watson & Norris, PLLC and attorneys Jane Watson, Louis Watson, and Nick Norris.
  • Their response brief contained one totally made-up citation and three citations that misstated holdings.
  • The court imposed sanctions including disqualification, reporting obligations, and restrictions on Watson.
  • The order came from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, dated 2025-12-19.
  • The page says Watson had used an AI tool called Archie only within the firm's litigation-support software, but also used AI elsewhere without verification.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.