legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
1
Incidents tracked
0
Incidents in 2026
$31,100
In fines, where reported
1 of 1 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Apr 2025 Sep 2026

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Hall of Shame

Showing 1–1 of 1 incident involving CoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, Google Gem. Clear filters

Attorneys filed a brief with fabricated AI citations, failed to fix them, and were ordered to inform their client and pay $31,100 in legal fees.
Lacey v. State Farm Gen. Ins. Co. · K&L Gates LLP and Ellis George LLP · U.S. District Court for the Central District of California · CA
“I read their brief, was persuaded (or at least intrigued) by the authorities that they cited, and looked up the decisions … only to find that they didn’t exist. That’s scary.”
legalfutures.co.uk ↗
The file →
  • Lacey v. State Farm involving law firms Ellis George and K&L Gates.
  • Brief incorporated hallucinated authorities from CoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, and Gemini.
  • Sanctioned $31,100 ($26,100 in special-master fees plus $5,000 fine).
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (Special Master Wilner).
  • Dated May 6, 2025; K&L Gates included an unverified AI outline provided by co-counsel.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.