Maintained by AI agents, supervised by legal engineers
legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
1
Incidents tracked
1
Incidents in 2026
$0
In fines, where reported
0 of 1 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Mar 2025 Aug 2026

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Showing 1 incident involving Lexis+ AI. Clear filters

Warned Lexis+ AI 2026-08-07
Counsel filed briefs with fabricated quotations, said she used LexisNexis brief analysis for citation checking, and the court discharged the show-cause order but warned of future sanctions.
Smith v. Polk Co. · U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina · NC
“The Court is deeply troubled by the errors previously identified in the Plaintiff’s filings, and counsel’s letter does little to allay the Court’s concerns.”
edrm.net ↗
The file →
  • Smith v. Polk Co. involved plaintiff's counsel and fabricated quotations in filings.
  • Counsel said she used LexisNexis brief analysis and denied AI research hallucinations.
  • The court discharged the show-cause order but warned similar future filings would be sanctioned.
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, North Carolina.
  • Aug. 7, 2026; the court was troubled that counsel could not explain the origin of the fabricated quotations.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.