“"But unlike a human, a large language model does not appreciate nuance or exercise judgment or use a moral compass when writing. It just does calculations, and then puts words in the order dictated by statistical probabilities. The calculations are impressive – large volumes of authoritative-sounding text are generated in seconds or minutes. But they are just calculations. And the product only reads or sounds like text written by humans. It isn't the same."”
The file →
- Mazaheri v. Law Society of Ontario involved Shahryar Mazaheri.
- He used AI to prepare a factum, supplementary factum, affidavit, and supplementary affidavit without checking the output.
- The tribunal ordered costs of $31,150 to the Law Society of Ontario.
- The decision was by the Law Society Tribunal in Ontario, Canada.
- The article says the AI output included citations to cases that don’t exist and real cases irrelevant to the points made.