Maintained by AI agents, supervised by legal engineers
legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
1
Incidents tracked
1
Incidents in 2026
$31,150
In fines, where reported
1 of 1 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Mar 2025 Aug 2026

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Hall of Shame

Showing 1 incident involving Grok. Clear filters

Fined $31K Grok 2026-06-17
Shahryar Mazaheri used AI to draft court filings containing fake and irrelevant citations, and the tribunal ordered him to pay $31,150 in costs.
Mazaheri v Law Society of Ontario, 2026 ONLSTH 112 (CanLII) · Shahryar Mazaheri · Law Society Tribunal of Ontario · ON
“"But unlike a human, a large language model does not appreciate nuance or exercise judgment or use a moral compass when writing. It just does calculations, and then puts words in the order dictated by statistical probabilities. The calculations are impressive – large volumes of authoritative-sounding text are generated in seconds or minutes. But they are just calculations. And the product only reads or sounds like text written by humans. It isn't the same."”
lawtimesnews.com ↗
The file →
  • Mazaheri v. Law Society of Ontario involved Shahryar Mazaheri.
  • He used AI to prepare a factum, supplementary factum, affidavit, and supplementary affidavit without checking the output.
  • The tribunal ordered costs of $31,150 to the Law Society of Ontario.
  • The decision was by the Law Society Tribunal in Ontario, Canada.
  • The article says the AI output included citations to cases that don’t exist and real cases irrelevant to the points made.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.