legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
9
Incidents tracked
5
Incidents in 2026
$19,871
In fines, where reported
5 of 9 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Apr 2025 Sep 2026

Charting 7 of 9 incidents; the rest are undated or fall outside this window.

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Showing 1–9 of 9 incidents involving Claude. Clear filters

Referred to the bar $8K Claude
A lawyer filed immigration submissions with four non-existent case citations and was referred to the WA legal regulator and ordered to pay costs.
Australia immigration case (anonymised lawyer referred to Legal Practice Board of Western Australia) · Federal Court of Australia
““demonstrates the inherent dangers associated with practitioners solely relying on the use of artificial intelligence in the preparation of court documents and the way in which that interacts with a practitioner’s duty to the court”.”
theguardian.com ↗
The file →
  • An anonymised lawyer in an immigration case was referred to the Legal Practice Board of Western Australia.
  • The court found the submissions contained four case citations that did not exist.
  • The federal court ordered costs of $8,371.30 and made the referral.
  • Federal Court of Australia; the lawyer was not named in the article.
  • Justice Arran Gerrard said the case showed the dangers of solely relying on AI; the lawyer used Claude and Copilot.
Fined $4K Claude 2026-08-04
Defense counsel Hilary B. Miller was fined $3,500 and referred to the Grievance Committee after filing two motions containing 16 AI-generated legal errors.
Barteca Intermediate Holdings LLC et al. v. Tacobarn Newtown LLC et al. · Hilary B. Miller · U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut · CT
“Applying the framework discussed above, the Court finds that the first factor—verification and inquiry—weighs in favor of sanctions because Attorney Miller failed to conduct a reasonable human verification of the authorities cited in the challenged filings before submitting them.”
ediscoveryllc.com ↗
The file →
  • Barteca Holdings v. Tacobarn Newtown involved defense attorney Hilary B. Miller.
  • Miller submitted two motions containing 16 errors in citations, quotations, and rules from unverified AI research.
  • The court imposed a $3,500 fine and referred the attorney to the court's Grievance Committee.
  • The case was before the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.
  • On August 4, 2026, Judge Vernon D. Oliver found Miller violated Rule 11 after using Claude, OpenLaw, and ChatGPT.
Fined $1K Claude 2026-05-18
A lawyer filed a brief with Claude-generated fabricated quotes and was fined $1,000 plus ordered to take an AI-assistance course.
Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLC · W.D. Louisiana · LA
“Ignorance of the risks of AI usage is no longer an excuse,”
cebudailynews.inquirer.net ↗
The file →
  • Jerry Edwards Jr. sanctioned the lawyer in a Louisiana district court matter.
  • The brief contained seven AI-generated quotes attributed to prior rulings that were false or misrepresented.
  • The court fined him $1,000 and ordered a three-hour AI-assisted legal practice course.
  • Louisiana district court, Louisiana.
  • The sanctions order was issued May 18; the lawyer said a clerk had caught errors in an earlier draft and then he used Claude to fix them.
Warned Claude 2026-05-15
A motion to quash included Claude-generated phantom quotations, and the lawyers apologized to the court; the page does not report a sanction order.
AFGE v. Trump · Binnall Law Group PLLC; Jason Greaves; Jesse Binnall; Lindsay McKasson · US District Court for the Northern District of California · CA
““While I reviewed the cited cases generally to confirm their applicability, as well as many other cases that I reviewed, I did not double check the quotations and obviously did not read the cited cases carefully,” Greaves wrote.”
news.bloomberglaw.com ↗
The file →
  • AFGE v. Trump involved Binnall Law Group PLLC lawyers.
  • Jason Greaves used Claude Console to draft a motion to quash a subpoena.
  • The motion included “phantom” quotations, prompting apologies to the court.
  • Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California, California.
  • Date: 2026-05-15; the page describes the misuse but reports no sanction order.
Caught, not sanctioned Claude 2026-05-06
A court filing in the Trump layoffs case contained phantom legal quotations generated by Claude Console, prompting sanctions scrutiny.
Trump layoffs court filing involving phantom legal quotations · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · NY
incidentdatabase.ai ↗
The file →
  • Trump layoffs court filing involving phantom legal quotations
  • Claude Console generated the false legal quotations in the filing
  • The page does not say a sanction was imposed
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • 2026-05-06; the incident was about fabricated quotations, not citations
Fined $5K Claude 2026-04-27
Raja Rajan filed court papers with made-up AI-generated case citations; Judge Kai N. Scott imposed a $5,000 sanction and required extra AI-and-ethics CLE.
Bunce v. Visual Tech. Innovations, Inc. · Raja Rajan · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania · PA
“any first-year law student knows you have to verify the authority cited, and warned that a third strike would mean referral to Pennsylvania's disciplinary board.”
news.bloomberglaw.com ↗
The file →
  • Bunce v. Visual Tech. Innovations Inc.; Raja Rajan of Cherry Hill, NJ
  • He used made-up, AI-generated case citations in filings for a second time
  • Judge Kai N. Scott fined him $5,000 and ordered additional CLE
  • US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • 2026-04-20; Scott said there was no valid reason for not verifying the citations
Referred to the bar Claude 2025-08-15
A lawyer filed submissions citing four non-existent cases based on Claude AI research, and Judge Gerrard ordered personal costs and referred the conduct.
JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2025] FedCFamC2G 1314 · Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2)
“Legal principles are not simply slogans which can be affixed to submissions without context or analysis.”
mpslaw.com.au ↗
The file →
  • JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship involved a lawyer whose submissions cited four cases.
  • The citations came from Claude AI research and the cases did not exist or did not support the propositions.
  • Judge Gerrard ordered the lawyer to pay costs personally and referred the conduct to the regulatory body.
  • Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 2).
  • 2025-08-15; the court declined to reproduce the citations to avoid contributing to case hallucinations.
Caught, not sanctioned Claude 2025-05-23
Latham filed an expert declaration with a Claude-formatted citation that fabricated the article title and authors.
Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC · Latham & Watkins · N.D. Cal. · CA
“undermines the overall credibility”
llms-for-lawyers.com ↗
The file →
  • Concord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBC involved Latham and Watkins.
  • Claude was used to format a reference, but it fabricated the title and authors.
  • Judge Susan van Keulen struck the affected paragraph; no one was sanctioned.
  • N.D. Cal., California.
  • May 2025; the error was a single citation in an expert declaration.
Fined $2K Claude 2024-11-01
Brandon Monk filed a wrongful-termination brief with fake cases and AI-generated quotes and was fined $2,000 plus ordered to take an AI legal course.
Gauthier v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. · Brandon Monk · U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas · TX
legal.thomsonreuters.com ↗
The file →
  • Brandon Monk and Monk Law Firm were sanctioned.
  • He submitted a filing with fake cases and AI-generated quotes in a Goodyear wrongful-termination suit.
  • The court fined him $2,000 and ordered an AI legal course.
  • A Texas federal judge imposed the sanction.
  • November 2024; Judge Marcia Crone had ordered him to explain why he should not face sanctions.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.