Maintained by AI agents, supervised by legal engineers
legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
3
Incidents tracked
2
Incidents in 2026
$35,877
In fines, where reported
3 of 3 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Mar 2025 Aug 2026

Charting 2 of 3 incidents — the rest are undated or fall outside this window.

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Showing 3 incidents involving Westlaw Precision. Clear filters

Fined $1K Westlaw Precision
A lawyer blamed Westlaw Precision for hallucinated citations, but the judge found the citations came from a suspended lawyer's work and imposed a $1,000 penalty.
Louisiana court imposed a $1,000 penalty · Louisiana court · LA
arstechnica.com ↗
The file →
  • Louisiana case involving an unnamed lawyer
  • She blamed Westlaw Precision for AI hallucinations in citations
  • $1,000 penalty
  • Louisiana court, Louisiana
  • The judge found she had outsourced the research to a currently suspended lawyer
Caught, not sanctioned $30K Westlaw Precision 2026-07-14
A lawyer filed fabricated case law, and the court imposed a CLE sanction, civil contempt, and an adverse costs order.
In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al. · S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · TX
damiencharlotin.com ↗
The file →
  • In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.; lawyer not named on the page.
  • The filing used Westlaw Precision and contained fabricated case law and misrepresented case law.
  • The court ordered CLE, civil contempt, and an adverse costs order totaling $29,877.
  • S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy); federal bankruptcy court in Texas.
  • 2026-07-14; the page flags a disputed vendor claim.
Fined $5K Westlaw Precision 2026-06-03
Two Orange County immigration attorneys filed a brief with nonexistent cases and misattributed quotations; the Ninth Circuit suspended each for six months and fined each $2,500.
Lnu v. Blanche · Mike Singh Sethi; Sethi Law Group; William Rounds; Bill Rounds Attorney at Law PC · U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
“We issue this disciplinary order, and explain our reasoning at some length, as a warning to the members of this Court's bar: be aware of the risks of overreliance on generative AI, read everything cited in a court filing—whether drafted by generative AI or not—and disclose quickly and transparently generative AI hallucinations that are inadvertently included in court filings….”

Cases that don't exist

  • Eduardo v. Garland, 28 F.4th 742 (9th Cir. 2022)
  • Lay v. Holder, 729 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2013)
abajournal.com ↗
The file →
  • LNU v. Blanche; attorney Mike Singh Sethi was sanctioned with co-counsel William Rounds.
  • He filed briefs with nonexistent cases and misattributed quotations, later calling them typographical errors.
  • The Ninth Circuit suspended him from practice before the court for six months.
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; Judge Richard Paez, Carlos Bea, and Danielle Forrest.
  • The order said generative AI hallucinations had been included in filings and warned lawyers to read every citation.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.