legaltech.fyi Beta

Tracker

Sanctions watch

Every incident where a lawyer got caught filing AI-fabricated citations. The Hall of Shame.

Embed this
1
Incidents tracked
1
Incidents in 2026
$9,000
In fines, where reported
1 of 1 report an amount

The curve

Incidents per month

Last 18 months of published incidents, by the date of the court's order.

Apr 2025 Sep 2026

Blamed by name

Counts only incidents where the filing court or the reporting named the tool.

Hall of Shame

Showing 1–1 of 1 incident involving First Drafts. Clear filters

Fined $9K First Drafts 2026-06-08
Judge Sharion Aycock sanctioned four lawyers after both sides filed briefs citing AI-invented cases, cancelled the trial, and paused the proceedings.
Withers v. City of Aberdeen · Kathleen Wilson · U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi · MS
““This case presents the Court with an unusual scenario — attorneys for both litigants engaged in similar sanctionable conduct,””
legalcheek.com ↗
The file →
  • Contract dispute in the City of Aberdeen fee case before Judge Sharion Aycock.
  • Both sides' filings cited cases the court found did not exist after AI research and drafting.
  • Four lawyers were sanctioned; the two drafting lawyers were fined $2,500 and $3,500, and the other two were fined $1,000 each.
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi.
  • June 11, 2026; the order said the duty to verify work “is absolute” and “cannot be outsourced to technology or delegated to co-counsel”.
Get Sanctions Watch in your inbox
New AI-citation sanctions, the morning after they hit the docket.